![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
via http://ift.tt/2lkdZjG:
haroldhighballjordan:
DEFCON 1: that couple that rarely has any interaction and/or all their interaction is so ridiculously brief that you’ll take pretty much anything as a sign of their love for each other.
DEFCON 2: that couple whose interactions are always strictly platonic but you’re so desperate for the ship to be real that you twist and turn it in every way to make it seem as though it were the most sexual and/or romantic act that was to ever exist.
DEFCON 3: that couple who just makes it too goddamn easy in that their every interaction is laced with so much subtext and sexual undertone that you’re 99.97% sure the writers are trying to fuck with you.
DEFCON 4: that couple that literally takes each other on dates, tell the other that they love them on a regular basis, keep pictures of each other in their apartments, and are legitimately married in alternate universes and you’re just sitting there trying to understand how and/or why this ship isn’t considered canon.

haroldhighballjordan:
DEFCON 1: that couple that rarely has any interaction and/or all their interaction is so ridiculously brief that you’ll take pretty much anything as a sign of their love for each other.
DEFCON 2: that couple whose interactions are always strictly platonic but you’re so desperate for the ship to be real that you twist and turn it in every way to make it seem as though it were the most sexual and/or romantic act that was to ever exist.
DEFCON 3: that couple who just makes it too goddamn easy in that their every interaction is laced with so much subtext and sexual undertone that you’re 99.97% sure the writers are trying to fuck with you.
DEFCON 4: that couple that literally takes each other on dates, tell the other that they love them on a regular basis, keep pictures of each other in their apartments, and are legitimately married in alternate universes and you’re just sitting there trying to understand how and/or why this ship isn’t considered canon.
